How to parse SMTP responses to identify hard and soft bounces?

Summary

Parsing SMTP responses is critical for identifying hard and soft bounces, which is essential for maintaining good email deliverability and sender reputation. SMTP enhanced status codes offer a structured approach, where the first digit indicates success (2xx), transient failure (4xx), or permanent failure (5xx). However, relying solely on these codes is insufficient. A nuanced approach is needed, involving analyzing the specific wording of the SMTP response and implementing custom logic to handle variations across different mail servers. Advanced parsing techniques, including regular expressions and natural language processing, are recommended for accurate interpretation and to differentiate between various soft bounce scenarios. Manual review of responses sorted by receiver can also be helpful. Furthermore, Non-Delivery Reports (NDRs) also utilize these codes. Effective bounce management includes categorizing bounces and automatically removing hard bounces from email lists, while being aware that even repeated soft bounces can negatively impact deliverability. Setting up automated bounce processing is recommended to filter hard bounces, improve deliverability, and reduce costs.

Key findings

  • SMTP Codes: SMTP codes indicate success, temporary failure or permanent failure.
  • Regex is Common: Regular expressions are commonly used to parse SMTP replies.
  • Automated Processing: Automated bounce processing filters hard bounces, improving deliverability.
  • List Hygiene: Removing hard bounces maintains list hygiene.
  • Nuance Required: Accurate bounce categorization requires nuanced analysis beyond basic SMTP codes.

Key considerations

  • Manual Review: Manual review helps identify nuances.
  • Server Variation: Different mail servers may produce varying responses.
  • Code Isn't Enough: Don't rely only on SMTP code as soft bounces can become hard bounces.
  • Advanced Techniques: Advanced parsing helps identify underlying reason for bounces.
  • Reputation: High bounce rates negatively impact sender reputation.

What email marketers say
11Marketer opinions

Parsing SMTP responses is crucial for identifying hard and soft bounces, which is essential for maintaining good email deliverability and sender reputation. Hard bounces, typically indicated by 5xx SMTP error codes, signify permanent delivery failures due to invalid or non-existent email addresses. Soft bounces, usually associated with 4xx codes, represent temporary issues like full inboxes or server problems. Repeated soft bounces should be treated with caution as they may become hard bounces. Effective bounce management involves using regular expressions to extract the SMTP status code and message, categorizing bounces, and automatically removing hard bounces from email lists. Contextual analysis of error messages is vital for accurate classification, as the wording and specific digits within the SMTP response provide granular information. Automated bounce processing is recommended to filter hard bounces, improve deliverability, and reduce costs.

Key opinions

  • Hard Bounce Codes: 5xx SMTP error codes generally indicate hard bounces, signifying permanent delivery failures.
  • Soft Bounce Codes: 4xx SMTP error codes typically indicate soft bounces, signifying temporary delivery issues.
  • Regex Parsing: Regular expressions are commonly used to extract SMTP status codes and messages from bounce responses.
  • Automated Processing: Automated bounce processing is essential for filtering hard bounces and maintaining a clean email list.
  • Contextual Analysis: Contextual analysis of the SMTP error message is crucial for accurately classifying bounces.

Key considerations

  • Nuance of Codes: While 5xx codes often indicate hard bounces and 4xx codes indicate soft bounces, this isn't always the case, requiring careful analysis.
  • Reputation Impact: High bounce rates negatively impact sender reputation, leading to deliverability issues.
  • Variety of Responses: Different mail servers may produce varying SMTP response messages, requiring adaptability in parsing logic.
  • Soft Bounce Monitoring: Repeated soft bounces should be monitored as they may eventually turn into hard bounces.
  • List Hygiene: Removing hard bounces from your email list is critical for maintaining good list hygiene and deliverability.
Marketer view

Email marketer from authsmtp.com explains that interpreting bounce emails requires parsing the SMTP response code within the email body. Different mail servers produce different output, however almost all will include the important SMTP response.

March 2023 - authsmtp.com
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks suggests separating 5xx from 4xx response codes and manually reviewing what is happening, sorting by receiver (e.g., Yahoo 5xx, Yahoo 4xx). He cautions that not all 5xx errors are permanent errors.

January 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from mailtrap.io explains that hard bounces occur when the email address is invalid or does not exist. These typically result in a 5xx SMTP error code, signaling a permanent delivery failure. Identifying these is crucial for maintaining a clean email list.

April 2024 - mailtrap.io
Marketer view

Email marketer from emailonacid.com, explains that effective bounce management requires parsing SMTP responses, categorizing bounces, and automatically removing hard bounces from your email list to maintain sender reputation.

June 2021 - emailonacid.com
Marketer view

Email marketer from sendgrid.com shares that soft bounces are temporary delivery failures, often due to a full inbox or server issues. They usually return a 4xx SMTP error code. Repeated soft bounces should be treated with caution as they can turn into hard bounces.

January 2023 - sendgrid.com
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that any 5xx response code should technically be considered a hard bounce. However, it's often more nuanced, and some 4xx responses (e.g., server busy) are effectively hard bounces. Suggests considering repeated 4xx responses as hard bounces.

August 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from stackoverflow.com responds that using regular expressions to parse SMTP replies is a common approach. They recommends focusing on extracting the three-digit code and any associated text message for detailed analysis.

February 2024 - stackoverflow.com
Marketer view

Email marketer from litmus.com explains that high bounce rates negatively impact sender reputation, leading to deliverability issues. Properly parsing SMTP responses and managing bounces is crucial for maintaining a healthy email program.

December 2022 - litmus.com
Marketer view

Email marketer from reddit.com shares that a good starting regex pattern is `^\d{3}[\s\-]+(.*)$` which captures the status code and message. Further refinement is needed based on specific server responses.

February 2023 - reddit.com
Marketer view

Email marketer from elasticemail.com recommends that you should set up automated bounce processing to filter hard bounces from your system and remove the addresses. This will improve deliverability and keep costs down as you aren't sending emails to bad addresses.

January 2024 - elasticemail.com
Marketer view

Email marketer from sparkpost.com shares that interpreting bounce codes involves understanding that 5xx codes indicate permanent errors, while 4xx codes suggest temporary issues. The specific digits provide more granular information, like mailbox full or user unknown.

August 2023 - sparkpost.com

What the experts say
2Expert opinions

Accurately categorizing bounces from SMTP responses requires more than just looking at 4xx/5xx codes. A nuanced approach involving specific wording analysis and custom logic is needed due to variations across mail servers. Advanced parsing techniques, including regular expressions and natural language processing, are recommended to interpret responses accurately and identify the underlying reasons for bounces. Contextual analysis of error messages is crucial for differentiating soft bounce scenarios.

Key opinions

  • Nuanced Approach: Categorizing bounces accurately goes beyond simple 4xx/5xx codes.
  • Custom Logic: Custom logic is needed to handle variations across different mail servers.
  • Advanced Parsing: Advanced parsing techniques (regex, NLP) are recommended for accurate interpretation.
  • Contextual Analysis: Contextual analysis of error messages is crucial for differentiating soft bounces.

Key considerations

  • Server Variations: Be aware of variations in SMTP responses from different mail servers.
  • Message Wording: Pay attention to the specific wording of SMTP responses.
  • Resource Intensity: Advanced parsing techniques can be resource-intensive.
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains that accurately categorizing bounces requires a nuanced approach beyond simple 4xx/5xx codes. It involves considering the specific wording of the SMTP response and implementing custom logic to handle variations across different mail servers.

November 2021 - Word to the Wise
Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource recommends using advanced parsing techniques, including regular expressions and natural language processing, to accurately interpret SMTP responses and identify the underlying reasons for bounces. Contextual analysis of the error message is crucial for differentiating between various soft bounce scenarios.

October 2023 - Spam Resource

What the documentation says
4Technical articles

SMTP response codes, as detailed in various documentation sources, provide a structured method for determining email delivery outcomes. The first digit of the code indicates success (2xx), a transient failure (4xx), or a permanent failure (5xx), enabling programmatic identification of hard and soft bounces. Examining both the SMTP response codes and the accompanying messages is essential for categorizing bounces effectively, and regular expressions are often used to match specific error messages for refined classification. Non-Delivery Reports (NDRs) in systems like Exchange Server also utilize these codes to categorize delivery failures.

Key findings

  • Structured Codes: SMTP enhanced status codes provide a structured way to determine email delivery outcomes.
  • Code Classes: The first digit indicates success (2xx), transient failure (4xx), or permanent failure (5xx).
  • Bounce Categorization: Examining codes and messages categorizes bounces.
  • Regex Usage: Regex patterns are used to match specific error messages.
  • NDR Integration: NDRs include codes to categorize delivery failures.

Key considerations

  • Detailed Messages: Detailed error messages should be analyzed for more specific classifications, not just the code itself.
  • Varied Implementations: Be aware that different systems (e.g., Exchange Server) may have their own nuances in how they report bounces.
  • Programmatic Parsing: Parsing requires programmatic solutions to extract the code and messages.
Technical article

Documentation from exim.org details that bounce processing involves examining the SMTP response codes and messages to categorize bounces. Hard bounces (permanent failures) typically have 5xx codes, while soft bounces (temporary failures) have 4xx codes. Regex patterns are used to match specific error messages for finer-grained classification.

November 2022 - exim.org
Technical article

Documentation from mozilla.org outlines that SMTP response codes are three-digit numbers where the first digit signifies the class of response: 2xx (success), 4xx (transient failure), and 5xx (permanent failure). Parsing these codes is the first step in identifying bounce types. Detailed error messages should be analyzed for more specific classifications.

November 2024 - mozilla.org
Technical article

Documentation from microsoft.com details that Non-Delivery Reports (NDRs) in Exchange Server include SMTP response codes that categorize delivery failures. Analyzing these codes is essential for understanding and managing bounced messages.

October 2022 - microsoft.com
Technical article

Documentation from ietf.org explains that SMTP enhanced status codes provide a structured way to determine the outcome of an email delivery attempt. The first digit indicates success, persistent transient failure, or permanent failure. The second digit indicates the subject area, and the third provides detail. Parsing these codes allows for programmatic identification of hard and soft bounces.

August 2021 - ietf.org