Is Return Path certification worth it for improving email deliverability at Gmail?

Summary

The overall sentiment is that Return Path/Validity Certification can be a helpful tool in improving email deliverability at Gmail, primarily by encouraging better email marketing practices and necessitating a cleanup of sending habits. It's not a guaranteed solution or a 'magic bullet' for inbox placement. Experts emphasize that building a solid sender reputation through consistent, ethical sending practices, genuine engagement with subscribers, and proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are critical. Adhering to Google's and Microsoft's bulk sending guidelines, maintaining good list hygiene, avoiding spam traps, and focusing on relevant content are essential factors that certification alone cannot replace. Certification provides value by providing feedback and improving existing processes, but it requires effort and commitment and should not be viewed as a substitute for fundamental email marketing best practices.

Key findings

  • No Guarantee: Certification doesn't guarantee inbox placement, especially with poor sending practices.
  • Cleanup is Key: The primary benefit comes from the cleanup process and the enforcement of better practices.
  • Reputation Paramount: A good sender reputation built through ethical practices and engagement is more important than certification.
  • Authentication Required: Proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is crucial for deliverability.
  • Commitment Needed: Success requires a sender's ongoing commitment to good email hygiene and engagement.

Key considerations

  • Underlying Issues: Address underlying issues in sending practices before relying on certification.
  • Google & Microsoft Guidelines: Prioritize compliance with Google's and Microsoft's bulk sending guidelines.
  • List Hygiene: Maintain good list hygiene to avoid spam traps and ensure engaged subscribers.
  • Engage Subscribers: Focus on providing relevant content and encouraging engagement from subscribers.
  • Cost vs. Benefit: Evaluate the cost of certification relative to the potential benefits, considering it requires effort and isn't a quick fix.

What email marketers say
7Marketer opinions

The consensus across various email marketing experts and platforms is that Return Path certification (now Validity Certification) can offer some benefits for improving email deliverability at Gmail, primarily through enforcing better sending practices and providing data for issue identification. However, it's not a guaranteed solution or a 'magic bullet'. Its effectiveness is heavily dependent on the sender's commitment to good email hygiene, sender reputation management, and engagement monitoring. Strong authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), list hygiene, subscriber engagement, and relevant content are crucial factors that certification alone cannot replace.

Key opinions

  • Not a Guarantee: Certification does not guarantee inbox placement, especially for senders with poor sending practices.
  • Cleanup Process: The value of certification largely comes from the process of cleaning up sending practices and adhering to best practices.
  • Data and Feedback: Certification can provide data and feedback to help identify and resolve deliverability issues.
  • Supplements, Doesn't Replace: Certification supplements but does not replace the need for strong sender reputation management and engagement monitoring.

Key considerations

  • Commitment: Success depends on the sender's commitment to good email hygiene and maintaining best practices.
  • Strong Authentication: Proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is crucial for ensuring deliverability.
  • List Hygiene: Maintaining good list hygiene is essential for a positive sender reputation.
  • Engagement: Subscriber engagement plays a significant role in determining email deliverability.
  • Content Relevance: Content should be relevant to the subscribers.
Marketer view

Email marketer from SendGrid explains that while Return Path certification can offer benefits, a better approach to ensuring deliverability lies in using proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), engaging with subscribers and segmenting mailing lists. Maintaining good list hygiene is key.

October 2022 - SendGrid
Marketer view

Email marketer from Litmus emphasizes the importance of sender reputation and engagement metrics in determining email deliverability. While not directly addressing Return Path certification, it highlights the factors Gmail considers when filtering emails.

July 2024 - Litmus
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit user states that Return Path certification can provide a marginal benefit, but it's not a substitute for good sending practices. They emphasize the importance of focusing on list hygiene, engagement, and relevant content.

October 2021 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from GlockApps Blog answers that Return Path certification (Validity Certification) isn't a magic bullet for email deliverability. While it can provide some benefits, such as improved sender reputation, it's essential to have a solid email marketing strategy and follow best practices to achieve consistent inbox placement.

July 2024 - GlockApps Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email on Acid Blog shares that Return Path certification can improve deliverability but emphasizes that it's most effective when combined with strong sending practices. It can offer a boost but doesn't replace the need for sender reputation management and engagement monitoring.

July 2023 - Email on Acid Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from MailerLite Blog explains that while Return Path certification (now Validity Certification) aims to improve email deliverability, it's not a guaranteed solution. It helps by providing feedback and requiring senders to adhere to best practices, but success depends on the sender's commitment to maintaining good email hygiene.

June 2023 - MailerLite Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks confirms that certification doesn't guarantee inbox placement for poor senders. The value comes from the cleanup process and the data provided by various providers (Microsoft, Yahoo, etc.) which helps in identifying and resolving issues before they impact delivery at Gmail.

October 2023 - Email Geeks

What the experts say
4Expert opinions

Experts generally agree that Return Path/Validity Certification can be beneficial for improving email deliverability at Gmail, primarily by enforcing better email marketing practices and requiring a cleanup of sending habits. However, it is not a simple solution or a guaranteed path to the inbox. Building a strong sender reputation through ethical sending practices and genuine engagement with subscribers is considered more critical. Certification can be a useful tool for senders committed to improving their program, but it requires effort and isn't a 'golden ticket'.

Key opinions

  • Cleanup Required: Certification prompts a cleanup of sending processes, leading to improved practices.
  • Not a Guarantee: Certification is not a guaranteed fix for deliverability problems.
  • Reputation Matters More: Sender reputation, built through ethical practices, is more important than certification.
  • Requires Commitment: Effectiveness depends on a sender's commitment to improving their overall email program.

Key considerations

  • Cost vs. Benefit: Consider the cost of certification versus the potential benefits, recognizing it's not a quick fix.
  • Process is Key: Focus on the underlying improvements to sending practices that certification encourages.
  • Engagement is Paramount: Prioritize building genuine engagement with subscribers to improve sender reputation.
  • Avoid Spam Traps: Ensure you are not sending to spam traps.
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks shares that the benefit of Return Path certification comes from the cleanup process and improvements made to the sending program, rather than Gmail directly favoring certified senders.

November 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that sender reputation, built through consistent and ethical sending practices, is more important than any certification program for deliverability at Gmail. He suggests focusing on genuine engagement with subscribers and avoiding spam traps.

August 2022 - Spam Resource
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks suggests that if the client is willing to spend money, they could pay Validity to get certified, but they will discover it's not simple and requires cleaning up their process.

April 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise responds that Return Path certification (now Validity Certification) provides value by enforcing better email marketing practices and cleaning up sending habits. It's not a golden ticket, but a useful tool for senders committed to improving their overall program and deliverability.

May 2024 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says
4Technical articles

Documentation suggests that Return Path/Validity certification can improve deliverability by ensuring adherence to industry best practices and compliance with specific requirements. However, Google and Microsoft prioritize adhering to their bulk sending guidelines, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), spam rates, and engagement metrics. Implementing email authentication standards and following best practices are essential for improving deliverability and demonstrating sender legitimacy to mailbox providers.

Key findings

  • Best Practices Matter: Following industry best practices and complying with specific requirements is crucial for deliverability.
  • Authentication is Key: Email authentication standards such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are essential for improving deliverability.
  • Google and Microsoft Guidelines: Adhering to Google's and Microsoft's bulk sending guidelines is critical for deliverability.
  • Engagement Metrics: Engagement metrics influence Gmail's filtering decisions.

Key considerations

  • Implement Authentication: Ensure proper implementation of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
  • Comply with Guidelines: Follow Google's and Microsoft's bulk sending guidelines.
  • Monitor Engagement: Monitor and improve engagement metrics to improve deliverability.
  • Validity Compliance: Check the sender is Validity compliant.
Technical article

Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools explains that adhering to Google's bulk sending guidelines is crucial for deliverability. While it doesn't mention Return Path certification directly, it outlines the specific requirements for authentication, spam rates, and engagement that influence Gmail's filtering decisions.

February 2024 - Google Postmaster Tools
Technical article

Documentation from RFC Editor explains the technical specifications for email authentication standards such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, which are essential for improving deliverability and demonstrating sender legitimacy to mailbox providers like Gmail. Implementing these standards can improve your standing.

December 2021 - RFC Editor
Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft answers that Microsoft provides information for senders, but it doesn't specifically mention Return Path certification. They emphasize the importance of following best practices for sending emails to Microsoft email accounts to ensure deliverability.

October 2023 - Microsoft
Technical article

Documentation from Validity's website explains that their certification program offers benefits like improved deliverability and brand reputation by ensuring that certified senders adhere to industry best practices and comply with specific requirements.

April 2024 - Validity Website