How to resolve persistent IP reputation issues with Microsoft despite IP warmups and clean lists?

Summary

Resolving persistent IP reputation issues with Microsoft despite warm-up and clean lists requires a comprehensive strategy encompassing technical configuration, proactive monitoring, engagement with Microsoft, and meticulous data management. A multi-faceted approach is necessary, beginning with ensuring pristine data quality through segmentation and targeting engaged subscribers, followed by verification of proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, PTR). Active monitoring of IP reputation via SNDS, third-party tools, Google Postmaster Tools (despite being for Gmail, it provides insights) and Sender Score is critical. Proactive engagement means getting pre-emptive accommodation when warming up IP, setting up FBLs, contacting Microsoft support, and carefully analyzing bounce codes. Technical elements include contacting your ISP for S3150 and ISP related issues, and ensuring content is spam free.

Key findings

  • Pristine Data & Segmentation: Prioritize sending to engaged subscribers and implement robust list segmentation.
  • Authentication is Key: Ensure proper SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and PTR records are configured and verified.
  • Proactive Microsoft Engagement: Engage with Microsoft via SNDS, direct support, and feedback loops.
  • Comprehensive Monitoring: Utilize various monitoring tools (SNDS, Sender Score, Google Postmaster Tools, third-party tools) to track reputation.
  • Thorough Bounce Analysis: Analyze bounce codes for insights into specific delivery failures.
  • Address S3150: When receiving a S3150 error, the recipient network is on Microsoft's blocklist, requiring ISP intervention.
  • Content is King: Review email content and ensure it is spam free and does not trigger any spam traps.

Key considerations

  • SNDS Enrollment & Monitoring: Enroll in SNDS and actively monitor data for complaint rates and spam trap hits.
  • Authentication Audit & Maintenance: Regularly audit SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and PTR records for accuracy and proper configuration.
  • Proactive Communication with Microsoft: Contact Microsoft support, particularly when encountering persistent issues.
  • Gradual IP Warmup: When warming up, ask Microsoft for pre-emptive accommodation.
  • Third-Party Reputation Monitoring: Use third-party tools to assess IP reputation across multiple blocklists.
  • Content Review: Employ content analysis tools to identify and mitigate potential spam triggers.
  • Establish Feedback Loops: Set up FBLs to receive complaint data directly from Microsoft.
  • Analyze Hard Bounces: Analyze hard bounces to diagnose underlying problems to help resolve

What email marketers say
12Marketer opinions

Persistent IP reputation issues with Microsoft, despite warm-up and clean lists, require a multi-faceted approach. Key recommendations involve proactively engaging with Microsoft through SNDS and direct support channels, scrutinizing data quality and segmentation, meticulously reviewing authentication settings (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, PTR records), and diligently monitoring reputation through Microsoft SNDS and third-party tools. Analyzing bounce codes and email content for spam triggers is also crucial, alongside considering pre-emptive accommodation requests during IP warm-up and ensuring pristine data quality.

Key opinions

  • Microsoft Engagement: Direct engagement with Microsoft support and enrollment in SNDS are crucial for understanding and addressing specific IP reputation issues.
  • Data Quality: Maintaining pristine data quality through segmentation and sending to engaged subscribers is paramount for building a positive reputation.
  • Authentication: Ensuring correct configuration of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and PTR records is vital for establishing trust with Microsoft's email servers.
  • Reputation Monitoring: Actively monitoring IP reputation using Microsoft SNDS, Sender Score, and third-party tools is essential for identifying and addressing potential issues promptly.
  • Bounce Analysis: Analyzing bounce codes provides specific insights into delivery failures, enabling targeted remediation efforts.
  • Proactive Request: When warming up a dedicated IP it is important to ask Microsoft for pre-empetive accomodation of that IP.

Key considerations

  • SNDS Enrollment: Enroll in Microsoft's Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) early to gain visibility into IP reputation and identify potential problems.
  • List Segmentation: Implement robust list segmentation strategies to prioritize sending to engaged subscribers and minimize negative signals to Microsoft.
  • Authentication Audit: Regularly audit and verify the correct configuration of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and PTR records to ensure optimal authentication.
  • Feedback Loops: Establish feedback loops with Microsoft to receive complaint data and promptly address subscriber issues.
  • Content Review: Thoroughly review email content for spam triggers and ensure adherence to Microsoft's sending guidelines.
  • Third-Party Tools: Leverage third-party deliverability testing tools to assess email placement rates and diagnose potential issues.
  • Contact MS Support: Engage with Microsoft support directly to inquire about specific IP reputation issues and request mitigation if necessary.
Marketer view

Email marketer from Tech Support Forum suggests contacting Microsoft support directly to inquire about the specific reasons for the IP reputation issues and request mitigation. They also recommend providing detailed information about the warmup process and list hygiene practices.

July 2024 - Tech Support Forum
Marketer view

Email marketer from Deliverability Discussions recommends analyzing bounce codes received from Microsoft to understand the specific reasons for delivery failures. They suggest addressing the underlying issues identified in the bounce messages.

January 2025 - Deliverability Discussions
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests providing a bounce message example. They also mention the possibility of requesting pre-emptive accommodation from Microsoft for a dedicated IP during warmup to lift limits and monitor the IP.

January 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Marketing Forum recommends enrolling in Microsoft's Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) to monitor IP reputation and identify potential sending issues that might be triggering blocks. SNDS provides data on complaint rates and spam trap hits.

December 2024 - Email Marketing Forum
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit suggests checking the IP's reputation on various blocklists using online tools to identify potential issues affecting Microsoft's servers. They also advise ensuring proper SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are configured.

May 2022 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from SuperUser advises using third-party deliverability testing tools to assess email placement rates and identify potential issues affecting deliverability to Microsoft inboxes.

January 2025 - SuperUser
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Deliverability Blog advises reviewing email content for spam triggers and ensuring compliance with Microsoft's sending guidelines. They recommend using content analysis tools to identify potential issues.

March 2022 - Email Deliverability Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests ensuring pristine data, working with Microsoft through their ticketing process, providing evidence, and building a case for help, as Microsoft is tight-lipped and doesn't actively participate in forums.

February 2025 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that an S3150 bounce indicates that part of the sender's network is on Microsoft's block list. They suggest opening a ticket with Microsoft to lift the block if it's a dedicated IP, or having Salesforce do so if it's a shared IP. If the IP repeatedly ends up on the S3150, the marketer suggests to send smaller, high quality traffic to warm up it's reputation far slower than other IPs.

August 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Marketing Tips Blog recommends segmenting the email list based on engagement and sending to the most engaged subscribers first to build a positive reputation with Microsoft. Gradually include less engaged segments as the IP reputation improves.

January 2023 - Email Marketing Tips Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from StackOverflow recommends ensuring that reverse DNS (PTR) records are properly configured and match the sending IP address. Mismatched PTR records can negatively impact IP reputation with Microsoft.

January 2024 - StackOverflow
Marketer view

Email marketer from SenderScore recommends regularly monitoring Sender Score to assess IP reputation across different mailbox providers, including Microsoft. A low Sender Score indicates potential deliverability issues that need to be addressed. Note that SenderScore is now part of Validity.

December 2024 - Validity

What the experts say
1Expert opinion

Diagnosing hard bounces is crucial for understanding the underlying reasons for deliverability issues, particularly persistent problems with Microsoft despite IP warmups and clean lists. Identifying the causes of these bounces provides valuable insights for resolving IP reputation problems.

Key opinions

  • Hard Bounce Analysis: Analyzing hard bounces is a direct way to identify the causes behind deliverability failures.
  • Root Cause: Understanding the reasons behind hard bounces can reveal specific issues affecting IP reputation with Microsoft.

Key considerations

  • Bounce Codes: Thoroughly examine bounce codes to determine the specific reasons for delivery failures.
  • Remediation Steps: Take appropriate remediation steps based on the diagnosed causes of hard bounces, such as correcting authentication issues or improving list hygiene.
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains diagnosing hard bounces can provide important information as to why there are deliverability issues.

November 2021 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says
4Technical articles

Resolving persistent IP reputation issues with Microsoft requires a combination of technical remediation and proactive monitoring. Key steps include addressing S3150 errors by contacting your ISP, implementing a gradual IP warmup strategy, establishing feedback loops with Microsoft, and leveraging Google Postmaster Tools to monitor overall IP reputation trends. These actions help identify and mitigate issues that impact deliverability to Microsoft domains.

Key findings

  • S3150 Error: An S3150 error indicates the sending network is on Microsoft's blocklist, requiring ISP intervention.
  • IP Warmup: A gradual IP warmup, with careful monitoring of metrics, is essential for establishing a positive reputation.
  • Feedback Loops: Feedback loops (FBLs) enable the identification and removal of problematic subscribers, improving IP reputation.
  • Reputation Monitoring: Google Postmaster Tools provides insights into overall IP reputation trends that can affect Microsoft deliverability.

Key considerations

  • ISP Communication: Contact your ISP promptly to resolve S3150 errors and address network-related issues.
  • Warmup Strategy: Implement a gradual IP warmup strategy, starting with small sending volumes and closely monitoring key metrics.
  • FBL Setup: Establish feedback loops with Microsoft to receive complaint data and address subscriber issues effectively.
  • Data Interpretation: Regularly monitor Google Postmaster Tools and interpret the data to identify potential deliverability issues affecting Microsoft.
Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft explains that the S3150 error indicates that part of the sender's network is on Microsoft's block list. They advise contacting your Internet service provider to resolve the issue, providing a link to troubleshooting information.

October 2023 - Microsoft
Technical article

Documentation from Google explains that although it's for Gmail, monitoring IP reputation through Google Postmaster Tools can give insight. Sudden drops in reputation can be indicative of wider issues that may be affecting sending to other mailbox providers such as Microsoft.

August 2021 - Google
Technical article

Documentation from ReturnPath recommends setting up feedback loops (FBLs) with Microsoft to receive complaints from recipients. Analyzing FBL data helps identify and remove problematic subscribers, improving IP reputation. Note that ReturnPath is now Validity.

May 2023 - Validity
Technical article

Documentation from SparkPost advises starting with a small sending volume and gradually increasing it over several weeks. It also suggests monitoring bounce rates, complaint rates, and engagement metrics closely to adjust the warmup strategy as needed.

April 2022 - SparkPost