How to handle spam traps and old addresses in a large B2C email program with single opt-in?

Summary

Managing spam traps and old addresses in a large B2C email program with single opt-in requires a comprehensive strategy encompassing list hygiene, proactive monitoring, engagement-based segmentation, and strategic address handling. Monitoring for spam trap hits, removing hard bounces, segmenting lists, implementing sunset policies, using re-engagement campaigns, validating email addresses in real-time, and monitoring sender reputation are critical. It is also important to understand email age, and contacting your ESP immediately if spam traps are hit, focusing on engaged users, and also engaging with resources such as Abusix is helpful.

Key findings

  • Engagement is Key: Focus on signals of subscriber engagement, prioritize sending to those who are interested (opens, clicks).
  • Sunset Policy: Implement a sunset policy to define when to stop mailing to unengaged customers automatically.
  • Segmentation: Segment lists based on engagement, purchase activity, and other factors to target problematic addresses and tailor messaging.
  • Real-time Validation: Use real-time validation at signup to prevent bad addresses from ever entering your list.
  • Proactive Monitoring: Monitor for spam trap hits, bounces, unsubscribes, and sender reputation to identify and address deliverability issues early.
  • Hard Bounce Removal: Immediately remove hard bounces to maintain your sender reputation and list hygiene.
  • List Cleaning: Regularly clean your list to remove inactive subscribers who may become spam traps or lower engagement rates.
  • Contact ESP: If spam traps are hit, contact your ESP immediately for support, since they will assist with identifying the address in question.

Key considerations

  • Two-Year Timeframe: Consider that recycled spam traps are often at least two years old, this helps in prioritizing which data to look at first.
  • Single vs. Double Opt-In: Consider transitioning to double opt-in for new sign-ups to improve list quality and reduce the risk of spam traps.
  • Website Activity: Analyze website activity to identify addresses that haven't engaged recently and may no longer be valuable.
  • Contact Abusix: Abusix may be able to provide assistance and valuable insights on identifying and addressing spam trap issues.
  • Time Based Sending: Splitting sends into different times can help narrow down when which send runs into a spam trap.
  • Filtering: Filtering out non-clickers can help to clean up the list.

What email marketers say
13Marketer opinions

Handling spam traps and old addresses in a large B2C email program with single opt-in requires a multi-faceted approach. Key strategies include segmenting email lists based on engagement, implementing a sunset policy to remove inactive subscribers, using re-engagement campaigns to revive interest, and employing email validation services to identify and remove invalid addresses. Monitoring sender reputation, tracking email engagement metrics, and transitioning to double opt-in for new sign-ups are also critical steps. Regular list cleaning and proper bounce handling are essential for maintaining a healthy sender reputation and improving deliverability.

Key opinions

  • Segmentation: Segmenting lists based on engagement levels (highly engaged, moderately engaged, inactive) allows for tailored messaging and targeted re-engagement efforts.
  • Sunset Policy: Implementing a sunset policy defines how long an email address remains on the list without engagement and dictates when to remove inactive subscribers.
  • Re-engagement: Re-engagement campaigns can revive interest among inactive subscribers, offering incentives to opt back in. Remove those who don't respond.
  • Email Validation: Using email validation services identifies and removes invalid addresses, including potential spam traps, improving list quality.
  • Monitoring Reputation: Monitoring sender reputation via tools like Google Postmaster Tools helps identify deliverability issues related to spam traps and address them proactively.
  • Double Opt-In: Transitioning to double opt-in (DOI) for new sign-ups ensures valid email addresses and reduces the risk of spam traps.
  • List Cleaning: Regular list cleaning, at least quarterly, removes unengaged subscribers who may be potential spam traps or contribute to low engagement rates.
  • Bounce Handling: Proper bounce handling identifies hard bounces (permanent failures) and removes those addresses immediately.
  • Time-Based Sending: Splitting sends into different times can identify which send is hitting spam traps, allowing quarantine of smaller data segments
  • Filter Non-Clickers: Filtering out non-clickers identifies uninterested recipients which can improve email delivery metrics

Key considerations

  • Engagement Metrics: Closely monitor email engagement metrics (opens, clicks, conversions) and set up alerts for unusual drops to quickly identify potential issues.
  • Proactive Pruning: Proactively prune email lists every few months to remove unengaged users, leading to better delivery rates.
  • Real-time Validation: Use real-time email validation during signup to prevent invalid addresses, typos, and disposable email addresses from entering your list.
  • Sender Reputation: Consistently monitoring and maintaining a good sender reputation is critical for ensuring high deliverability and avoiding spam filters.
  • Single vs Double Opt-in: While you currently use single opt-in, consider the advantages of double opt-in for new subscribers to improve list quality and reduce spam trap hits.
  • Legal Compliance: Ensure all email marketing practices comply with relevant regulations (e.g., GDPR, CAN-SPAM) to avoid legal issues and maintain subscriber trust.
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests filtering out all non-clickers if you don't think you are getting clicks from traps.

April 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from StackOverflow shares that they heavily rely on tracking email engagement metrics (opens, clicks, conversions). They set up custom alerts for unusual drops in engagement to quickly identify potential deliverability issues related to spam traps. URL: [https://stackoverflow.com/](https://stackoverflow.com/)

April 2024 - StackOverflow
Marketer view

Email marketer from Mailjet shares that for old addresses, implement a re-engagement campaign targeting inactive subscribers. Offer incentives, such as discounts or exclusive content, to encourage them to opt back in. If they don't respond, remove them from your list to avoid sending to potential spam traps. URL: [https://www.mailjet.com/](https://www.mailjet.com/)

April 2022 - Mailjet
Marketer view

Email marketer from EmailonAcid explains that use real-time email validation during signup to prevent invalid addresses from entering your list. This includes checking for typos, invalid domains, and disposable email addresses. URL: [https://www.emailonacid.com/](https://www.emailonacid.com/)

July 2024 - EmailonAcid
Marketer view

Email marketer from ReturnPath shares that maintaining good email hygiene involves regularly cleaning your list, removing invalid addresses, and suppressing unengaged subscribers. Use email validation services to identify and remove potential spam traps before sending campaigns. URL: [https://returnpath.com/](https://returnpath.com/)

July 2023 - ReturnPath
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests splitting daily sends into different times, identify which send hits the traps. Repeating until smaller segment of data to quarantine.

October 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from HubSpot responds that although you have single opt-in currently, for new sign-ups, transition to double opt-in (DOI) to ensure valid email addresses. DOI requires users to confirm their subscription, reducing the risk of spam traps and improving list quality. URL: [https://www.hubspot.com/](https://www.hubspot.com/)

September 2024 - HubSpot
Marketer view

Email marketer from Litmus explains that segmenting your email list based on engagement levels helps isolate inactive subscribers. Create segments for highly engaged, moderately engaged, and inactive users. Tailor messaging to each segment, focusing on re-engagement for the inactive group. URL: [https://www.litmus.com/](https://www.litmus.com/)

October 2024 - Litmus
Marketer view

Email marketer from Quora shares that monitoring your sender reputation is key. Use tools like Google Postmaster Tools to track your reputation and identify any issues that may arise from hitting spam traps. URL: [https://www.quora.com/](https://www.quora.com/)

September 2024 - Quora
Marketer view

Email marketer from MarketingProfs recommends that you perform regular email list cleaning, at least quarterly. Remove subscribers who haven't engaged in a significant period, as they may be potential spam traps or contribute to low engagement rates, harming your overall deliverability. URL: [https://www.marketingprofs.com/](https://www.marketingprofs.com/)

July 2023 - MarketingProfs
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests using an email address validation service/API for the segment with no web traffic to get a 'second opinion' on address quality and identify questionable addresses for early sunsetting or reconfirmation.

December 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from NeilPatel.com shares that a sunset policy defines how long an email address remains on your list without engagement. After a certain period (e.g., 6-12 months), send a final re-engagement email. If there's no response, remove the address from the list to protect your sender reputation. URL: [https://neilpatel.com/](https://neilpatel.com/)

December 2022 - NeilPatel.com
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit shares that they proactively prune their email list every 3 months by removing unengaged users and have seen delivery rates improve by 20%. They suggest running a re-engagement campaign and then removing unengaged users to improve deliverability. URL: [https://www.reddit.com/](https://www.reddit.com/)

July 2021 - Reddit

What the experts say
8Expert opinions

Managing spam traps and old addresses in a large B2C email program with single opt-in involves several expert-recommended strategies. Segmentation based on purchase activity, focusing on engagement-based list management, and having a clear sunset policy are crucial. Analyzing email age using a two-year timeframe for recycled spam traps, removing hard bounces, and contacting Abusix for assistance are also important. If spam traps are hit, contacting your ESP immediately is necessary to mitigate the problem.

Key opinions

  • Segmentation: Segmentation based on purchase activity helps isolate problematic addresses and target them for suppression or reconfirmation.
  • Engagement-Based List Management: Focusing on engagement signals like opens and clicks allows prioritizing active subscribers and reducing mail to uninterested ones.
  • Sunset Policy: Having a sunset policy defines when to stop mailing unengaged customers.
  • Two-Year Timeframe: Using a two-year timeframe as a constraint on bad addresses, especially for recycled spam traps, can help narrow down problem areas.
  • Hard Bounce Removal: Removing hard bounces separates known-bad addresses from good ones, maintaining sender reputation.
  • Contact Abusix: Contacting Abusix can provide valuable insights and assistance in identifying and addressing spam trap issues.
  • Contact ESP: Hitting a spam trap should lead to immediate contact with your ESP, since they will assist with identifying the address in question.

Key considerations

  • Website Activity: Consider excluding addresses with no website activity in the last two years to identify less valuable and potentially problematic emails.
  • Recycled vs. Pristine Traps: Understand the difference between recycled and pristine spam traps to tailor your analysis and response appropriately.
  • Proactive Measures: Implement proactive measures like engagement-based segmentation and sunset policies to prevent future issues with spam traps and old addresses.
  • Urgent Action: Address spam trap hits urgently to avoid long term deliverability issues.
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks suggests adding "hasn't been any website activity" in two years to the analysis, identifying addresses that aren't valuable and can be removed if they don't confirm.

December 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains the importance of having a sunset policy. The sunset policy looks at the customers who don't engage, and at what point it is ok to stop mailing them.

August 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks clarifies that the two-year timeframe applies to recycled traps, while pristine traps could be newer. However, given the history, recycled traps are more likely due to the lack of bounce handling detection.

August 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks suggests contacting Abusix for assistance and considers that Abusix are very good at seasoning their spamtraps. They suggest using the two-year timeframe for recycled traps as a constraint on bad addresses. They also suggest combining this with removing obvious domains to narrow down the problem email addresses. Worst case reconfirming this smaller subset of addresses.

May 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that hitting a spam trap is not a permanent deliverability problem, though it can be serious. The biggest issue is that you don't know which email address it was that triggered the trap. You need to address it quickly, as a number of traps in a short period can cause permanent problems. It goes on to suggest you should contact your ESP immediately.

April 2024 - Spam Resource
Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that you should separate known-bad addresses from good addresses by removing hard bounces from the active list. This maintains the reputation with the mailbox providers.

September 2024 - Spam Resource
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks suggests using segmentation based on purchase activity (e.g., purchasers in last 90 days, active/no purchase in last 90 days, inactive). By sending/holding out different times to each segment, you can observe behavior and identify the segment hiding the bad data, then target a smaller group for suppression, validation, or reconfirmation.

June 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise (Laura Atkins) recommends focusing on engagement-based list management by looking at signals that a subscriber is interested and delivering more mail to those users and less to those who are not. This can be opens or clicks.

May 2023 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says
4Technical articles

Managing spam traps and old addresses involves crucial steps documented by various sources. Monitoring for spam trap hits with tools like SparkPost is essential, watching for spikes in bounces/unsubscribes, and promptly suppressing identified addresses. Regular list cleaning as outlined by SendGrid, removing old/inactive addresses and utilizing suppression lists, helps maintain a healthy reputation. RFC emphasizes proper bounce handling, processing bounce messages, and immediately removing hard bounces. Google Postmaster Tools enables monitoring domain reputation with Gmail users, offering insights into spam rates and deliverability issues.

Key findings

  • Spam Trap Monitoring: Monitoring spam trap hits is crucial; watch for unexpected spikes in bounces or unsubscribes as indicators.
  • Address Suppression: Immediately suppress addresses that trigger spam traps to protect sender reputation.
  • Regular List Cleaning: Regular list cleaning is essential for removing old/inactive addresses to maintain a healthy sender reputation.
  • Hard Bounce Handling: Proper bounce handling is critical; remove hard bounces (permanent failures) from your list immediately.
  • Sender Reputation Monitoring: Use tools like Google Postmaster Tools to monitor your domain's reputation with Gmail users; monitor spam rates, etc.

Key considerations

  • Proactive Monitoring: Proactively monitor for spam trap hits and address any deliverability issues as they arise.
  • Data-Driven Decisions: Use hard bounce data and metrics from monitoring tools to inform list cleaning and suppression strategies.
  • Timely Action: Act promptly to suppress addresses and address any deliverability concerns to prevent further damage to your sender reputation.
  • Tool Utilization: Utilize available tools like SparkPost, SendGrid, and Google Postmaster Tools to aid in the management of your email program's deliverability.
Technical article

Documentation from RFC explains that proper bounce handling is critical. Set up your system to automatically process bounce messages and identify hard bounces (permanent failures). Remove these addresses from your list immediately. URL: [https://www.rfc-editor.org/](https://www.rfc-editor.org/)

June 2023 - RFC
Technical article

Documentation from SendGrid explains that regular list cleaning is essential to remove old or inactive addresses. Use hard bounce data to identify invalid emails and implement a suppression list to prevent future sends to these addresses. This helps maintain a healthy sender reputation. URL: [https://sendgrid.com/](https://sendgrid.com/)

March 2023 - SendGrid
Technical article

Documentation from SparkPost explains that monitoring for spam trap hits is crucial. Look for unexpected spikes in bounces or unsubscribes, which can indicate spam trap interactions. Segment lists and suppress addresses that trigger these traps immediately to protect sender reputation. URL: [https://www.sparkpost.com/](https://www.sparkpost.com/)

September 2021 - SparkPost
Technical article

Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools explains that you can use Postmaster Tools to monitor your domain's reputation with Gmail users. This tool provides insights into spam rates, feedback loop data, and other metrics that can help identify and address deliverability issues. URL: [https://gmail.com/postmaster](https://gmail.com/postmaster)

February 2025 - Google