What are the biggest gripes about deliverability services offered by ESPs?

Summary

Email marketers, experts, and documentation sources identify numerous concerns regarding ESP deliverability services. Key themes include a lack of transparency (hiding data, inaccurate metrics), limited data access (raw SMTP responses, bounce logs), inadequate tools (IP reputation management, spam filters, list cleaning), poor customer support, complex authentication, unhelpful SMTP error codes, insufficient feedback loop integration, lack of guidance on certification programs and blocklist removals, and inadequate email testing processes, including lack of accurate previews and deliverability monitoring. Overall, there's a demand for greater transparency, better data access, improved support, more effective tools, and simpler processes to enhance email deliverability.

Key findings

  • Lack of Transparency: ESPs frequently lack transparency in reporting, hide or alter data, and provide inaccurate metrics, hindering effective troubleshooting.
  • Data Access Limitations: Limited access to raw SMTP responses and bounce logs restricts users' ability to diagnose deliverability issues effectively.
  • Insufficient Tools: ESPs often lack adequate tools for managing IP reputation, preventing spam, cleaning lists, and monitoring deliverability performance.
  • Poor Support: Customer support from ESPs is often slow, unhelpful, and lacking in adequate training to handle deliverability issues.
  • Authentication Complexities: Complex authentication requirements (DKIM, SPF, DMARC) and a lack of ESP support create frustration and lead to failures.
  • Inadequate Guidance: ESPs frequently offer insufficient guidance on list hygiene, certification programs, and blocklist removals, leaving senders to navigate complex processes independently.
  • Poor Error Handling: Vague SMTP error codes and a lack of detailed explanations from ESPs complicate the diagnosis and resolution of deliverability problems.

Key considerations

  • Prioritize Transparency: Select ESPs that provide complete transparency in deliverability reporting, data handling, and metric calculation.
  • Demand Data Access: Ensure the ESP provides easy access to raw SMTP responses, bounce logs, and other relevant data for in-depth analysis.
  • Evaluate Toolsets: Choose ESPs offering robust tools for managing IP reputation, preventing spam, cleaning lists, monitoring performance, and conducting thorough email testing (inbox placement, previews).
  • Assess Support Quality: Evaluate the responsiveness, expertise, and training of the ESP's customer support team.
  • Simplify Authentication: Seek ESPs that provide comprehensive support and simplified processes for implementing DKIM, SPF, and DMARC.
  • Seek Guidance & Education: Utilize external resources to educate yourself and your team and seek ESPs that offer strong assistance in areas such as best practices for list hygiene and how to approach certification programs and blocklist removals.
  • Understand Error Codes: Supplement the ESP's error reporting with external resources to fully understand the meaning and implications of SMTP error codes.

What email marketers say
12Marketer opinions

Email marketers express several gripes regarding deliverability services offered by ESPs. These include difficulties with DKIM key management, limited access to raw SMTP responses and bounce logs, lack of transparency in deliverability reporting, inadequate tools for managing IP reputation, problems with spam filters, poor customer support, insufficient list cleaning tools, the cost and complexity of dedicated IPs, inadequate email testing process, challenges in understanding email placement (inbox vs. spam folder), and limited monitoring tools for tracking deliverability performance. Overall, there is a desire for more control, transparency, and support from ESPs in managing and improving email deliverability.

Key opinions

  • Lack of Transparency: ESPs often lack transparency in deliverability reporting, making troubleshooting difficult for users.
  • Limited Access to Data: Marketers struggle with limited access to raw SMTP responses and bounce logs, hindering their ability to diagnose deliverability issues effectively.
  • Insufficient Tools: ESPs may not provide adequate tools for managing IP reputation, preventing spam, or cleaning email lists, forcing users to find their own solutions.
  • Poor Support: Customer support from ESPs is often slow and unhelpful, leaving users frustrated when facing deliverability problems.
  • Complex Authentication: Managing DKIM keys and understanding email placement present difficulties for many marketers.
  • Limited monitoring and inaccurate testing: ESPs may offer inadequate monitoring tools for deliverability tracking or offer inaccurate email preview testing process

Key considerations

  • Transparency: Prioritize ESPs that offer transparent and detailed deliverability reporting to facilitate effective troubleshooting.
  • Data Accessibility: Seek ESPs that provide access to raw SMTP responses and bounce logs for in-depth analysis of deliverability issues.
  • Tool Availability: Opt for ESPs that offer robust tools for managing IP reputation, preventing spam, and cleaning email lists.
  • Customer Support: Choose ESPs known for responsive and helpful customer support to assist with deliverability challenges.
  • Dedicated IP: Evaluate the costs and benefits of dedicated IPs and select ESPs that offer affordable and manageable options.
  • Testing and Monitoring: Look for ESPs that use testing process that is up to par or offer the adequate deliverability monitoring tools for tracking performance over time.
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email on Acid blog explains that the email testing process is not up to par. Email previews are not that accurate as their tool.

May 2024 - Email on Acid Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from GMass Blog explains that a major issue is the limited monitoring tools provided by ESPs for tracking deliverability performance over time.

December 2021 - GMass Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit shares that ESPs sometimes lack robust list cleaning tools. This can lead to sending to invalid or inactive addresses, negatively impacting deliverability.

December 2023 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks explains they have no access to raw SMTP responses, so all they have to go by is "Hard Bounce" and "Soft Bounce."

December 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks echoes the bounce message comment, stating that they spend a good deal of time every day combing through bounce logs for clues.

December 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks shares that their biggest gripe is the difficulty involved in using their DKIM keys instead of the CNAME scheme the ESP wants to force on them.

February 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Litmus Blog shares that the issue of understanding email placement, specifically getting emails into the inbox and not the spam folder, is a big concern.

February 2025 - Litmus Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from Mailjet Blog shares that one of the biggest issues is managing IP reputation. ESPs often don't provide enough tools or guidance on maintaining a good sending reputation, leading to deliverability problems.

January 2022 - Mailjet Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from Quora responds that a frequent concern is the cost and complexity of dedicated IPs. ESPs often make it difficult for smaller senders to obtain and manage their own IPs, hindering deliverability control.

October 2022 - Quora
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit explains that poor customer support is a major issue. ESPs often have slow response times and unhelpful advice when users encounter deliverability problems.

May 2024 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from Sendinblue Blog responds that a common complaint is dealing with spam filters. ESPs can sometimes lack effective tools for preventing emails from landing in spam folders, requiring users to implement their own solutions.

March 2024 - Sendinblue Blog
Marketer view

Email marketer from SparkPost Blog explains that a major gripe is the lack of transparency in deliverability reporting. Users often don't get enough detail about why emails are failing, making troubleshooting difficult.

December 2024 - SparkPost Blog

What the experts say
6Expert opinions

Experts identify several key concerns regarding email deliverability services. These include ESPs hiding or altering crucial data like bounce messages, providing inadequate training to well-intentioned staff, making it difficult to access raw bounce logs, supplying inaccurate or misleading deliverability metrics, offering insufficient guidance on list hygiene, and lacking support for the increasingly complex email authentication requirements. Overall, the experts emphasize a need for more transparency, better training, improved data access, more accurate metrics, and stronger support in managing email deliverability.

Key opinions

  • Data Obscuration: ESPs often hide or alter important deliverability data, hindering effective troubleshooting and analysis.
  • Insufficient Training: Inadequate training of ESP staff can lead to poor advice and ineffective support.
  • Limited Data Access: Difficulty in accessing raw bounce logs prevents users from thoroughly investigating deliverability issues.
  • Misleading Metrics: Inaccurate or misleading deliverability metrics provided by ESPs can negatively impact analysis and improvement efforts.
  • List Hygiene Neglect: ESPs frequently offer insufficient guidance and support for maintaining clean and engaged email lists.
  • Authentication Complexity: Growing complexity of email authentication requirements, coupled with a lack of ESP support, creates significant frustration for senders.

Key considerations

  • Demand Transparency: Prioritize ESPs that offer complete transparency regarding data, including unaltered bounce messages and comprehensive reporting.
  • Evaluate Training: Consider the expertise and training levels of ESP staff to ensure they can provide effective support.
  • Access Data Directly: Choose ESPs that provide easy access to raw data, such as bounce logs, for thorough analysis.
  • Verify Metrics: Critically evaluate the accuracy and reliability of deliverability metrics provided by ESPs.
  • Prioritize Hygiene: Select ESPs that offer comprehensive guidance and support for effective list hygiene practices.
  • Seek Authentication Support: Choose ESPs that provide thorough support in navigating the complexities of email authentication requirements.
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks shares that their biggest gripe is difficulty in getting raw bounce logs and would prefer a CSV download button so power users can see what actually happened.

December 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise shares that the insufficient guidance and support for list hygiene practices is a critical issue. ESPs need to better assist senders in maintaining clean and engaged email lists.

November 2021 - Word to the Wise
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks explains that ESPs are hiring well-meaning and smart people but failing to provide adequate training, so they end up cargo culting advice.

December 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks shares that their biggest gripe is hiding data like actual bounce messages and silently changing other data before reporting it to customers.

January 2025 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that one major problem is the often inaccurate or misleading deliverability metrics provided by ESPs, which can hinder proper analysis and improvement efforts.

February 2023 - Spam Resource
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise responds the growing complexity of authentication requirements and the lack of support provided by ESPs to navigate them is an ongoing frustration for senders.

June 2022 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says
5Technical articles

Documentation sources highlight several key issues with ESP deliverability services. Vague SMTP error codes and lack of detailed explanations from ESPs hinder problem diagnosis. Insufficient integration with feedback loops limits visibility. Inadequate guidance on email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) leads to deliverability failures. Lack of support for certification programs impedes reputation improvement. Finally, ESPs often fail to provide sufficient support for resolving blocklisting issues, leaving senders to navigate the process themselves. The overall theme is a lack of clarity, support, and integration needed for effective deliverability management.

Key findings

  • Vague Error Codes: Standard SMTP error codes are often vague, and ESPs don't provide detailed explanations.
  • Lack of Feedback Loops: Insufficient integration with feedback loops from major mailbox providers limits visibility into deliverability problems.
  • Insufficient Authentication Guidance: ESPs provide inadequate guidance on implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, leading to failures.
  • No Certification Support: ESPs don't offer clear guidance or assistance with certification programs.
  • Limited Blocklist Support: ESPs fail to provide sufficient support for resolving blocklisting issues.

Key considerations

  • Decipher Error Codes: Seek additional resources or tools to understand SMTP error codes beyond what the ESP provides.
  • Utilize Feedback Loops: Implement and monitor feedback loops directly, even if ESP integration is limited.
  • Implement Authentication: Thoroughly implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, seeking external guidance if the ESP's support is insufficient.
  • Pursue Certification: Independently research and pursue certification programs to improve reputation, as ESPs may not offer adequate support.
  • Address Blocklistings: Understand the process for blocklist removal and be prepared to handle it independently, as ESP support may be limited.
Technical article

Documentation from Validity details that one of the biggest issues is that ESPs don't provide clear guidance or assistance with certification programs. This makes it difficult for senders to improve their reputation and deliverability with key mailbox providers.

September 2023 - Validity
Technical article

Documentation from Spamhaus highlights the difficulties in getting removed from blocklists. ESPs often don't offer sufficient support or guidance on resolving blocklisting issues, requiring senders to navigate the process themselves.

July 2021 - Spamhaus
Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft Docs highlights that issues arise from insufficient email authentication. ESPs may not enforce or provide adequate guidance on implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, leading to deliverability failures.

March 2022 - Microsoft Docs
Technical article

Documentation from RFC Editor explains that standard SMTP error codes are often vague and unhelpful. ESPs frequently don't provide detailed explanations of these errors, making it difficult to diagnose deliverability issues.

March 2022 - RFC Editor
Technical article

Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools details that a significant issue is the lack of comprehensive feedback loops. ESPs may not offer sufficient integration with feedback loops from major mailbox providers, limiting visibility into deliverability problems.

July 2023 - Google Postmaster Tools