Should I set up a Yahoo Sender Hub FBL if my ESP already has one?

Email marketer from Email Marketing Forum shares that for smaller senders, it might seem useful to get all the reports you can, but an ESP is likely aggregating this data already and this approach is likely to cause confusion.

Email marketer from Email Geeks states that the senderhub will alert you if reporting is already set up for that domain. Also notes that you need to have control over the reporting address and have to verify it.

Email marketer from Mailjet Help Center explains that if your ESP already provides FBL data, setting up a separate FBL with Yahoo Sender Hub might lead to duplicate reports and potential confusion. It's best to coordinate with your ESP to understand their FBL setup and whether additional configuration is needed.

Email marketer from EmailOnAcid mentions that it’s essential to align with your ESP’s processes for FBL management. Duplicating efforts can complicate the process and might not provide additional value.

Email marketer from Quora highlights that setting up multiple FBLs for the same domain could lead to conflicting reports and inaccurate insights. Coordinate with your ESP to leverage their expertise and avoid duplicate effort.

Email marketer from StackOverflow explains that when using an ESP, they often handle the FBL setup. Contact them first before setting anything up and confirm that is the case and they handle it for your domain, if this is the case then don't set it up yourself.

Email marketer from Reddit shares that having multiple FBLs can create a mess, especially if the data isn't properly aggregated. Coordination with your ESP is crucial to determine the best approach for monitoring complaints.

Email marketer from Litmus advises that domain authentication settings and feedback loops should be coordinated with your ESP. Duplicating FBL setups without understanding the existing configuration can lead to data conflicts and operational inefficiencies.

Expert from Word to the Wise emphasizes that understanding how your ESP handles FBL data is critical. If they are already processing it effectively, a separate setup is unnecessary. The focus should be on ensuring that you're receiving actionable insights from the FBL data, regardless of who manages it.

Expert from Spam Resource explains that if your ESP is already handling the FBL, setting up another one yourself is unlikely to provide any benefit and might even complicate things. It's usually best to stick with the ESP's setup.

Expert from Email Geeks advises that if the ESP already has a FBL set up, you probably don't want to double the number of reports, suggesting a local address that goes to /dev/null or drops the mail into a file / database somewhere.

Expert from Email Geeks advises that if the ESP is managing the FBL with their own d=, set up a receive-only address, store the messages for a week or so, and then purge them, ensuring access to confirm the confirmation email.

Expert from Email Geeks asks if the ESP has a FBL for your d= domain, or are they using a shared d= for all their customers?

Documentation from Microsoft SNDS emphasizes the importance of managing domain reputation and suggests that working with your ESP for FBL setup is often the most efficient approach. If they already handle it, avoid duplicating the effort.

Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools outlines the importance of domain verification and highlights that if your ESP is already managing this aspect, avoid duplicating the process. Focus on collaborating with your ESP for comprehensive email authentication and monitoring.

Documentation from Yahoo Sender Hub emphasizes that senders should avoid redundant FBL setups. Check with your ESP to determine if they already manage FBL reporting for your domain. If so, avoid creating a separate FBL to prevent conflicting data.

Documentation from SparkPost suggests that consolidating FBL data streams through your ESP is generally preferred. This ensures a unified view of complaint feedback and reduces the risk of misinterpreting data from multiple sources.