Why do political emails end up in spam folders?

Summary

Political emails often end up in spam folders due to a multifaceted combination of factors impacting sender reputation, user engagement, and technical implementation. Poor list management, including purchasing or sharing lists and failing to remove inactive subscribers, contributes significantly. Aggressive fundraising tactics, misleading subject lines, and irrelevant content lead to low engagement rates and high spam complaint rates. Furthermore, the failure to properly implement and monitor email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enables domain spoofing and makes it difficult to verify sender legitimacy. User reports marking emails as spam directly impact deliverability, and some email providers may disproportionately filter political content. The exploitation of unique donation email addresses and the use of questionable consent practices also play a role in this complex issue.

Key findings

  • Poor List Management: Practices like purchasing/sharing lists and failing to remove inactive users harm sender reputation.
  • Low Engagement/Complaints: Aggressive tactics/misleading content lead to low engagement and high spam complaints.
  • Authentication Failures: Improper DMARC implementation enables domain spoofing and reduces deliverability.
  • User Reporting: User reports of spam are a primary driver of spam classification.
  • Consent and Sender Reputation: Questionable consent practices negatively impact sender reputation.
  • Exploitation of Unique Email Addresses: The misuse of unique email addresses for donations can lead to increased spam filtering

Key considerations

  • Improve List Hygiene: Implement strong list management practices, focusing on organic growth and regular cleaning.
  • Enhance Engagement: Focus on creating relevant and engaging content to improve open rates and click-through rates.
  • Strengthen Authentication: Properly configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to authenticate emails and prevent spoofing.
  • Reduce Spam Complaints: Prioritize user experience, honor opt-out requests promptly, and ensure clear communication.
  • Obtain Explicit Consent: Only send emails to users who have explicitly consented to receive them and document that consent.
  • Protect Unique Email Addresses: Develop strategies to safeguard unique email addresses used for donations and prevent their exploitation by other organizations

What email marketers say
11Marketer opinions

Political emails frequently land in spam folders due to a combination of factors. Poor list management practices, such as purchasing lists, co-registration, and list sharing, are significant contributors. Aggressive fundraising tactics, misleading subject lines, and sending to unengaged or outdated lists also negatively impact deliverability. Low engagement rates (low open rates, high deletion rates) signal to email providers that the content is unwanted. User complaints, like marking emails as spam, are a critical factor. The absence of, or incorrect, DMARC implementation enables domain spoofing, while the failure to monitor DMARC reports hinders the identification and resolution of deliverability issues. Finally, some email providers disproportionately filter certain political content as spam based on user feedback.

Key opinions

  • List Management: Poor list hygiene (purchased lists, co-registration, list sharing) contributes to spam placement.
  • Engagement: Low engagement rates (opens, clicks) negatively impact deliverability.
  • Aggressive Tactics: Aggressive fundraising and misleading subject lines trigger spam filters.
  • User Complaints: High spam complaint rates result in spam classification.
  • Authentication: Lack of DMARC implementation and monitoring enables domain spoofing.
  • Filtering Bias: Some providers disproportionately filter certain political content.

Key considerations

  • List Hygiene: Maintain clean email lists by removing inactive subscribers and avoiding purchased lists.
  • Engagement: Focus on improving engagement through relevant content and personalized messaging.
  • Communication Practices: Avoid aggressive fundraising tactics and misleading subject lines.
  • Authentication: Implement and monitor DMARC to prevent domain spoofing and ensure deliverability.
  • Compliance: Adhere to email marketing best practices and regulations, such as CAN-SPAM.
  • Segmentation: Segment audiences based on interest and engagement to increase relevance.
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit states that many political campaigns don't follow best practices for email marketing, leading to low engagement and high spam complaints. Aggressive tactics and irrelevant content contribute to the problem.

December 2023 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from Nieman Lab shares that Gmail’s spam filter disproportionately flags left-leaning political fundraising emails as spam. This is in part because users mark these messages as spam or unsubscribe.

February 2025 - Nieman Lab
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks shares experience that political senders often attribute spam issues to filter bias, but the real causes are usually poor list hygiene and contact sharing. Gives an example of a 'urgent donation' email being flagged as phishing because of deceptive copy and linking to a z-list payment provider.

December 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks shares that the left generally shares email lists, while the right tends to buy them from each other.

November 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Stay in Touch explains that aggressive fundraising tactics, misleading subject lines, and sending to unengaged or outdated email lists contribute to political emails being flagged as spam.

January 2023 - Stay in Touch
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that the difference in spam rates between political parties often comes down to how they manage their email lists, using Trump's campaign as an example with varying spam rates across different sending domains.

February 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Mailjet explains that low engagement rates with political emails, such as low open rates and high deletion rates, can signal to email providers that the content is unwanted, leading to placement in the spam folder.

August 2022 - Mailjet
Marketer view

Email marketer from StackExchange says that personalized content can help improve deliverability but also, aggressive or misleading subject lines that don't match the content of the email can trigger spam filters, causing political emails to land in spam folders.

January 2024 - StackExchange
Marketer view

Email marketer from Quora answers that political emails often end up in spam because political organizations may purchase lists or use aggressive tactics that result in recipients marking the messages as spam. Poor list hygiene is also a major factor.

June 2022 - Quora
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that email providers prioritize delivering emails that users want and blocking those they don't, regardless of the content, unless it's harmful.

December 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that US political senders often use co-registration and list sharing, combined with poor list management and a light regulatory environment, which creates a perfect storm for email deliverability issues.

October 2024 - Email Geeks

What the experts say
3Expert opinions

Political emails often end up in spam due to several key issues. One contributing factor is the practice of using unique email addresses for donations, which can then be exploited by other political entities, leading to spam classification. A significant problem is the lack of proper DMARC implementation or monitoring, allowing domain spoofing and hindering the ability to address deliverability issues. Additionally, employing tactics that negatively impact sender reputation, such as questionable consent practices, failing to remove inactive users, and sending large volumes of unwanted emails, also contributes to spam placement.

Key opinions

  • Unique Email Exploitation: Unique donation email addresses can be exploited, leading to increased spam.
  • DMARC Issues: Lack of DMARC implementation or monitoring allows domain spoofing and hinders deliverability issue resolution.
  • Sender Reputation: Tactics that harm sender reputation (questionable consent, inactive users, high volume) cause spam placement.

Key considerations

  • Email Address Management: Implement strategies to protect unique donation email addresses from exploitation.
  • DMARC Implementation: Properly implement and actively monitor DMARC to prevent domain spoofing and improve deliverability.
  • Sender Reputation Management: Adopt ethical consent practices, regularly remove inactive users, and manage email volume to maintain a positive sender reputation.
Expert view

Expert from Spamresource.com explains that using tactics that lower your sender reputation causes political emails to land in spam. This can include questionable consent practices, failing to remove inactive users, and sending a consistently high volume of unwanted emails.

July 2023 - Spamresource.com
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks shares an experience where using unique email addresses for donations to specific left-leaning candidates resulted in subsequent spam from different political hopefuls using the same address, leading to the original politician losing future donations.

June 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains that many political campaigns don't implement DMARC, or implement it incorrectly. This allows spammers to easily spoof their domains, which makes it more likely legitimate campaign emails will be flagged as spam. Furthermore, campaigns often don't monitor their DMARC reports, which prevents them from identifying and addressing deliverability issues.

November 2021 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says
3Technical articles

Political emails are often flagged as spam due to several technical and user-related factors. User reports, specifically recipients marking emails as spam, significantly contribute to spam classification. The use of purchased or scraped email lists increases the likelihood of encountering spam traps, leading to blocklisting and spam folder placement. Additionally, failure to properly authenticate emails using SPF, DKIM, and DMARC prevents email providers from verifying the sender's legitimacy, resulting in emails being marked as spam.

Key findings

  • User Reports: User reports of spam directly impact deliverability and spam classification.
  • List Source: Purchased or scraped lists contain spam traps, leading to blocklisting.
  • Authentication: Lack of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC authentication results in deliverability issues.

Key considerations

  • User Feedback: Prioritize user experience and respect opt-out requests to minimize spam complaints.
  • List Acquisition: Avoid purchasing or scraping email lists; focus on organic list growth and permission-based marketing.
  • Email Authentication: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC authentication to verify sender legitimacy and improve deliverability.
Technical article

Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools explains that user reports, such as marking emails as spam, are a key factor in determining spam classification. High complaint rates from recipients will negatively impact deliverability.

December 2021 - Google Postmaster Tools
Technical article

Documentation from Spamhaus explains that using purchased or scraped email lists, which often contain spam traps, will lead to deliverability issues and placement on blocklists, ultimately causing emails to land in spam folders.

January 2024 - Spamhaus
Technical article

Documentation from RFC explains that failing to properly authenticate emails using SPF, DKIM, and DMARC can cause emails to be flagged as spam because email providers cannot verify the sender's legitimacy.

October 2023 - RFC-Editor