Suped

Should I include a reply-to header if it's identical to the from header?

9 Marketer opinions5 Expert opinions4 Technical articles4 Resources

Summary

The consensus among experts, email marketers, and documentation sources is that including a Reply-To header identical to the From header is generally redundant. Email clients automatically direct replies to the From address if no Reply-To is present. However, it typically doesn't cause deliverability issues. A significant concern is using a 'no-reply' address, which negatively impacts engagement, sender reputation, and customer loyalty, regardless of Reply-To settings. The primary purpose of the Reply-To header is to designate an address different from the From address for handling replies. Older systems might benefit from having the explicit Reply-To declaration.

Key findings

  • Redundancy: Including an identical Reply-To header is generally redundant.
  • From as Default: Email clients default to the From address if no Reply-To is present.
  • No-Reply Detriment: Using a 'no-reply' address significantly harms engagement and sender reputation.
  • Spam Signals: Reply-To configurations mimicking spammer tactics can harm deliverability.
  • Valid Address: Using a valid and monitored reply address is important for customer interaction.
  • Older Systems: Older systems might benefit from an explicit Reply-To definition.

Key considerations

  • Reply-To Purpose: Use Reply-To primarily to direct replies to an address different from the From address, like a team inbox.
  • No-Reply Avoidance: Avoid 'no-reply' addresses; always provide a functional reply address.
  • Configuration Risk: Ensure your Reply-To configurations do not inadvertently resemble spam techniques.
  • Engagement Impact: Carefully consider the impact on customer engagement when deciding to use a 'no-reply' address.
  • System Specifics: Consider your email system's handling of the Reply-To header.

What email marketers say
9Marketer opinions

The consensus is that including a Reply-To header identical to the From header is generally redundant but doesn't typically cause harm. Some older systems might benefit from the explicit declaration. However, using a 'no-reply' address, regardless of the Reply-To setting, is strongly discouraged due to its negative impact on engagement, sender reputation, and customer loyalty. While some sources indicate it's required in some circumstances, the prevailing advice is to maintain a valid, monitored reply address.

Key opinions

  • Redundancy: Including an identical Reply-To header is generally redundant.
  • No Harm: It typically doesn't cause deliverability problems.
  • No-Reply Detriment: Using a 'no-reply' address negatively affects engagement and sender reputation.
  • Valid Address: Using a valid, monitored reply address is crucial for customer interaction.
  • Older Systems: Some older systems might benefit from an explicit declaration.

Key considerations

  • Engagement Impact: Consider the impact on customer engagement when deciding whether to use a 'no-reply' address.
  • Deliverability Factors: Prioritize email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for deliverability over the presence of an identical Reply-To header.
  • Specific Needs: If you have specific needs for replies to go to a different address, use the Reply-To field accordingly, such as directing to a team inbox or support address.
  • System Requirements: If your system doesn't have a Reply-To field, or you are using an older system, an explicit declaration may be beneficial.
Marketer view

Email marketer from SuperOffice shares that using a no-reply address has a negative effect as customers cannot respond to questions or ask for help by replying directly. This can result in lost opportunities to solve customer problems, increase sales, and build customer loyalty.

March 2023 - SuperOffice
Marketer view

Email marketer from Sendinblue explains that the Reply-to field specifies where replies should be sent. While it can be the same as the From field, it is required in some circumstances.

July 2021 - Sendinblue
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit shares that there's generally no deliverability downside to having identical From and Reply-To, though some older systems might benefit from explicit declaration. Focus on authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for deliverability.

April 2024 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from Stack Overflow explains that setting Reply-To to the same address as From is redundant, but shouldn't cause problems. Not setting Reply-To means replies go to From, which is fine in most cases.

May 2021 - Stack Overflow
Marketer view

Email marketer from EmailOctopus shares that the 'Reply-To' field specifies where replies should be sent. They advise keeping 'From' and 'Reply-To' the same unless you have a specific need for replies to go to a different address.

August 2022 - EmailOctopus
Marketer view

Email marketer from MailerLite shares that using a valid email address in the 'reply-to' field is important. If it is the same as the 'from' header, it is still important as some email clients and systems rely on it.

March 2022 - MailerLite
Marketer view

Email marketer from Gmass says that the Reply-To field is used to specify an address different from the From address for replies. They suggest using it to direct replies to a team inbox or support address.

May 2023 - Gmass
Marketer view

Email marketer from Litmus says that setting the reply-to as noreply affects engagement and reputation of sending domain

December 2023 - Litmus
Marketer view

Email marketer from Neil Patel Digital explains that using a ‘no-reply’ address can prevent you from receiving valuable feedback and engagement. Even if the from and reply-to are identical, a no-reply may harm sender reputation.

July 2022 - Neil Patel Digital

What the experts say
5Expert opinions

Experts generally agree that including a Reply-To header that is identical to the From header is unnecessary and redundant. Email clients will default to using the From address for replies if a Reply-To header is absent. However, including it doesn't typically cause harm. The critical point is to avoid using a 'no-reply' address, as this negatively impacts engagement and deliverability, regardless of the Reply-To setting. The Reply-To header is primarily useful for directing replies to an address different from the From address.

Key opinions

  • Redundancy: Including a Reply-To header identical to the From header is generally redundant.
  • Default Behavior: Email clients default to the From address for replies if no Reply-To is present.
  • No-Reply Harm: Using a 'no-reply' address negatively impacts engagement and deliverability.
  • Spam Signals: Reply-To headers mimicking spammer behavior (e.g., free email addresses) can harm deliverability.
  • No Harm: Including a redundant Reply-To generally doesn't cause deliverability issues.

Key considerations

  • Reply-To Purpose: Use the Reply-To header primarily to direct replies to an address different from the From address.
  • No-Reply Alternatives: Avoid using 'no-reply' addresses; instead, use a valid and monitored address.
  • Spam-Like Configuration: Ensure your Reply-To configuration doesn't resemble techniques used by spammers.
  • Address Similarity: Recognize that while using the same address is redundant it does not cause immediate issues.
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains that using a 'no-reply' address is bad practice as it inhibits engagement and prevents deliverability, regardless of having identical From and Reply-To addresses.

July 2024 - Word to the Wise
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks responds that one shouldn’t include a reply-to field if it’s the same as the from: field, but it doesn’t matter if you do.

May 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks explains that mail clients default to sending replies to the From: address, so if you’re using the same address in the From: and the Reply-To: there’s no need to put in a Reply-To: header. Reply-To: is a way to direct replies to a different place than the from: address. She advises against putting a no-reply@ address in the reply-to: header, as that is extremely consumer unfriendly.

April 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks shares that the point where reply-to affects deliverability is when the address in the reply to: mimics what a spammer does. That’s often a corporate domain with a reply to: pointing at a free mail address, or with one freemail address in the from: and a second, different freemail address in the reply-to. Using the same address in both is redundant but a lot of companies do it.

October 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Spamresource.com responds that in general, it's not necessary to include a Reply-To header if it's identical to the From header. Most email clients will automatically direct replies to the From address if no Reply-To is present. It is only necessary if you are using an address other than the from address.

April 2023 - Spamresource.com

What the documentation says
4Technical articles

The documentation sources consistently state that the Reply-To header specifies where replies to an email should be directed. If the Reply-To header is absent, replies are sent to the From address. While using the same address for both From and Reply-To is permissible, it is considered redundant because the From address is the default reply destination. The main purpose of the Reply-To header is to designate a different address for replies than the sender's address.

Key findings

  • Reply-To Purpose: Reply-To header specifies the address for email replies.
  • From as Default: If Reply-To is absent, replies are sent to the From address.
  • Redundancy: Using the same address for both From and Reply-To is redundant.
  • Valid Usage: Including the Reply-To header when identical to From does not violate standards.

Key considerations

  • Alternative Reply Address: Use Reply-To when replies should go to an address different from the sender's.
  • Header Choice: Decide whether the added clarity is worth the redundant header.
Technical article

Documentation from Mozilla explains the Reply-To header field for email messages. It specifies an email address different from the From: field that is used when the user hits "reply."

October 2022 - Mozilla
Technical article

Documentation from Oracle explains that the 'Reply-To' header specifies an email address for replies that is different than the 'From' header. They note if not specified, the 'From' header is used.

July 2021 - Oracle
Technical article

Documentation from RFC Editor specifies that the 'Reply-To:' field contains address(es) where replies should be directed. If absent, replies are sent to the address(es) in the 'From:' field. Including it when identical doesn't violate the standard, but is redundant.

August 2024 - RFC Editor
Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft Learn explains that the From: attribute specifies the address of the sender. The Reply-To: attribute specifies where replies should go. While often the same, Reply-To allows for a different address to handle responses.

May 2021 - Microsoft Learn

Related resources
4Resources

Include a "reply to" or "from" field on email compose to populate the ...
Include a "reply to" or "from" field on email compose to populate the ...

The “Reply-To:” header is a standard and legitimate header field in emails. emClient has no way of populating that field on a per-message basis.  Setting up Alias accounts is a different thing altogether.  A message sent from an account with a different “reply to” field is perfectly legitimate and simply redirects replies. The suggestion is to include a “Reply to” or “From” field in a compose form (it could be optional like the CC/BCC button) which will populate that header field.  Postbox, Ou...

eM Client
Discourse setting Reply-To value in `From` header field when using ...
Discourse setting Reply-To value in `From` header field when using ...

This issue was also reported on different topic related to setting up email replies. As suggested by @mpalmer I’m creating a new topic. The other users who reported this issue on this topic: https://meta.discourse.org/t/set-up-reply-via-email-support/14003/96 I’ve searched the forum and can’t seem to find an answer so after debugging this using a hMailServer SMTP server I’m beginning to think this may be a bug. This issue is causing issues like the SMTP server not DKIM signing the message sin...

Discourse Meta
How to remove REPLY TO from emails I send and only show FROM ...
How to remove REPLY TO from emails I send and only show FROM ...

eM Client shows Reply To in emails sent. How do I remove this? It should only show From and To. I understand that in Gmail you can specify a Reply To setting, but in the eM Client, you can’t edit the Reply To setting and in my case, completely remove it. Any ideas on how to remove it? I understand how to edit it (User Information > Email), but I want to remove it completely so it doesn’t show up in the emails other people receive.

eM Client
Sending emails with a Reply-To header - Plone Support - Plone ...
Sending emails with a Reply-To header - Plone Support - Plone ...

We have a client that is part of a larger government organization, which essentially means using the SMTP server with their government email address is not an option. What we'd like to do is configure the mail settings to use a Reply-To header in the message, and otherwise use our company's SMTP server with a relevant email address for the From header. This would be trivial to do for any given form handler that sends email, but the problem as I see it is there's no central place to change this ...

Plone Community

Related questions