Do X-Headers negatively impact email deliverability?

Summary

The influence of X-Headers on email deliverability is nuanced and not definitively negative. While some experts suggest X-Headers can be a signal for spam filters if they appear more frequently in spam emails, many consider their impact minimal compared to factors like sender reputation, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and content quality. RFC 6648 discourages the standard for adding them, considering it obsolete. X-Headers can introduce security risks like header injection if implemented incorrectly. When used for tracking or internal analysis, adhering to email standards and avoiding security vulnerabilities is vital. Documentation and community sources still provide guidance and tools for managing X-Headers, but a cautious and well-informed approach is crucial.

Key findings

  • Limited Direct Impact: X-Headers generally have a limited direct impact on deliverability compared to core factors like sender reputation and authentication.
  • Contextual Significance: If X-Headers contain elements disproportionately found in spam, they can serve as a signal for spam filters.
  • Security Vulnerabilities: Incorrectly implemented X-Headers can introduce vulnerabilities like header injection.
  • RFC Discouragement: The official standard for adding X-Headers is considered obsolete and discouraged.
  • Useful for Tracking: X-Headers can be valuable for internal tracking and analysis, but should be implemented correctly.

Key considerations

  • Prioritize Authentication: Focus primarily on implementing and maintaining robust authentication mechanisms (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
  • Maintain Sender Reputation: Prioritize building and safeguarding a positive sender reputation.
  • Secure Implementation: Implement X-Headers with meticulous security measures to prevent header injection and other exploits.
  • Adhere to Email Standards: Strictly adhere to email standards and best practices when configuring and utilizing X-Headers.
  • Monitor Spam Trends: Stay informed about current spam trends and avoid incorporating elements commonly found in spam within X-Headers.
  • Use Sparingly: Use X-Headers sparingly, only when necessary and with clear justification.

What email marketers say
8Marketer opinions

The impact of X-Headers on email deliverability is complex and debated. Some experts suggest that while X-Headers were considered in older spam filters, their influence today is minimal compared to factors like sender reputation, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and content quality. However, X-Headers can pose risks if used incorrectly, potentially leading to header injection vulnerabilities. Additionally, while they can be employed for internal tracking, adhering to email standards and avoiding security vulnerabilities is crucial. Some sources don't mention X-Headers at all, focusing instead on broader deliverability factors.

Key opinions

  • Limited Impact: The consensus is that X-Headers have a limited direct impact on deliverability compared to sender reputation, authentication, and content.
  • Historical Relevance: X-Headers were more significant in older spam filtering systems but are less important now.
  • Tracking Potential: X-Headers can be used for tracking purposes, but this introduces potential security risks.
  • Overall Quality: Deliverability issues related to X-Headers often indicate broader problems with the email's overall quality and sending practices.

Key considerations

  • Security: Implement X-Headers carefully to avoid header injection vulnerabilities.
  • Email Standards: Ensure X-Headers comply with email standards to prevent triggering spam filters.
  • Authentication: Focus on core authentication methods (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) as primary drivers of deliverability.
  • Sender Reputation: Prioritize building and maintaining a good sender reputation.
  • Content Quality: Ensure email content is relevant, engaging, and avoids spam triggers.
Marketer view

Email marketer from EmailToolTester responds that email deliverability is impacted by many factors, including but not limited to, sender reputation, authentication, content, and spam complaints. X-Headers are not mentioned specifically.

December 2023 - EmailToolTester
Marketer view

Email marketer from Postmark discusses best practices for email headers, focusing on standard headers like From, To, Subject, and Date, but does not specifically address X-Headers and their potential impact on deliverability.

June 2021 - Postmark
Marketer view

Email marketer from Litmus explains that improving email deliverability depends on authentication, sending reputation, and avoiding spam triggers. X-Headers are not mentioned specifically.

December 2021 - Litmus
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit shares that X-Headers can be used for tracking purposes, but should be used with caution. Be wary of header injection.

December 2021 - Reddit
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that while X-headers were weighted in spam filters 20 years ago, believing they influence deliverability today is like 'reading tea leaves'.

December 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Mailjet explains that some spam filters may look at X-Headers to identify spam. However, they are generally not as important as other factors like authentication, sender reputation, and content.

August 2023 - Mailjet
Marketer view

Email marketer from Stack Overflow answers question about how to properly inject X-Headers into emails. They share an example implementation for PHP using mail()

June 2024 - Stack Overflow
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that while any element in an email *could* impact deliverability, it's unlikely a single minor data point will pull otherwise good email into spam. If a non-obvious data point is causing issues, the overall quality of the email's data points is likely not good to begin with.

January 2022 - Email Geeks

What the experts say
4Expert opinions

Experts generally agree that X-Headers can be a potential signal for spam filters if they are more common in spam than in legitimate emails. However, good sending practices and overall email quality are more important factors. Using X-Headers for tracking purposes carries risks, and it's crucial to implement them correctly, adhering to email standards and avoiding security vulnerabilities. Experts recommend using them sparingly and ensuring they don't open the door to exploitation.

Key opinions

  • Potential Signal: X-Headers can act as a signal for spam filters if they are disproportionately present in spam emails.
  • Good Practices Matter: Good overall email sending practices can outweigh the potential negative impact of X-Headers.
  • Security Risks: Using X-Headers for tracking can create security vulnerabilities exploitable by malicious actors.
  • Responsible Use: When used, X-Headers should be implemented correctly and sparingly to avoid negative consequences.

Key considerations

  • Monitor Spam Trends: Be aware of elements commonly found in spam and avoid using them in your X-Headers.
  • Prioritize Sending Practices: Focus on maintaining good sender reputation, authentication, and content quality.
  • Secure Implementation: Implement X-Headers with robust security measures to prevent header injection and other exploits.
  • Use Sparingly: Limit the use of X-Headers to only essential purposes and avoid unnecessary customization.
  • Adherence to Standards: Follow email standards and best practices when implementing X-Headers.
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise responds that X- headers can be valuable for internal tracking and analysis but emphasizes the importance of ensuring they do not violate email standards or introduce security vulnerabilities that spammers could exploit. Using them correctly and sparingly is recommended.

December 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that using X-Headers for tracking purposes can present risks, especially if not implemented correctly. Malicious actors can potentially exploit vulnerabilities in custom headers to inject spam or phishing attempts.

November 2022 - Spam Resource
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks shares that if a specific element is more common in spam than in legitimate emails, it could potentially be a signal for a filter.

June 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks responds that senders with good practices can use various tools and unusual elements, yet maintain good email delivery because their overall practices are strong. They note that some clients grasp at 'flimsy straws' instead of addressing the underlying problems with their practices.

October 2023 - Email Geeks

What the documentation says
4Technical articles

The documentation presents a mixed view on X-Headers. RFC 6648 discourages their use, considering them obsolete. However, tools and configurations from Microsoft, cPanel, and DKIM Proxy still support their use, providing methods for analysis, customization, and integration, particularly for DKIM signatures. This suggests that while best practices might discourage them, they are still actively used and supported in various email systems.

Key findings

  • Obsolete Standard: RFC 6648 considers the standard for adding X-Headers obsolete and discourages their use.
  • Analysis Tools: Microsoft provides tools to analyze X-Headers within email messages.
  • Customization Support: cPanel provides methods for adding custom X-Headers by editing Exim configuration files.
  • DKIM Integration: DKIM Proxy documentation details how to add a DKIM signature to outbound email messages as an X-Header.

Key considerations

  • Weigh RFC Recommendations: Consider the RFC's recommendation against using X-Headers when designing email systems.
  • Utilize Analysis Tools: Use available analysis tools to understand the content and impact of X-Headers in email messages.
  • Proper Configuration: If using X-Headers, ensure they are configured correctly according to the relevant system documentation (e.g., cPanel, Exim).
  • DKIM Integration: If implementing DKIM, consider the available methods for adding the signature as an X-Header.
Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft explains how to use the Message Header Analyzer tool to get insights into the x-headers of emails.

April 2024 - Microsoft
Technical article

Documentation from DKIM Proxy shares how to configure the proxy to add a DKIM signature to outbound email messages as an X-Header.

February 2024 - DKIM Proxy
Technical article

Documentation from cPanel responds with how to add custom X-Headers by editing the exim configuration files.

April 2024 - cPanel
Technical article

Documentation from RFC 6648 shares that the standard for adding X-Headers, and similar parameters, to standard protocols is now considered 'obsolete' and discouraged.

August 2023 - RFC 6648