Why am I seeing spam spikes in Google Postmaster Tools on days with no email sends?

Summary

Spam spikes in Google Postmaster Tools on days with no email sends are complex and multi-faceted. Several factors contribute, including the delayed reporting of spam complaints, where past sends influence current metrics. Changes in user behavior, aggressive spam filtering by ISPs, and issues with list hygiene (stale email addresses or spam traps) also play a role. Technical issues like inconsistencies in sender reputation, authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) failures, and delayed Spam Confidence Level (SCL) adjustments can lead to spam filtering even without active sending. Additionally, the presence of compromised email accounts sending unauthorized emails, or shared IP addresses where other senders' poor practices affect your reputation can lead to spam spikes. Finally, spoofing and list bombing attacks from third parties can further exacerbate the issue. Machine learning algorithms by email providers can sometimes cope with these spikes, so analysis of feedback loops, monitoring sender reputation, and securing email systems are important.

Key findings

  • Complaint Delays: Spam reporting is often delayed, influencing current metrics.
  • External Factors: ISPs update filters, user behaviour changes, and third party spoofing impacts spam filters.
  • List Issues: Stale emails or spam traps cause complaints.
  • Reputation Problems: Poor sender history and inconsistent authentication hurt deliverability.
  • Technical Problems: Authentication issues or SCL adjustments lead to spam filtering.
  • Security Issues: Compromised accounts and shared IP's contribute to the issue.
  • Algorithm Management: Email providers Machine learning systems are designed to cope with spikes.

Key considerations

  • Monitor Reputation: Regularly check sender reputation metrics, bounce rates, and complaints.
  • Secure System: Audit and secure email systems to avoid compromisation.
  • Review Authentication: Ensure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are properly configured.
  • Hygiene: Implement strong email list hygiene practices to remove old or invalid accounts.
  • Analyze Feedback: Analyze feedback loops to pinpoint spam complaint origins.
  • Verify Dashboard: Verify dashboard accuracy with your ESP to eliminate misreporting.
  • Implement DMARC: Use DMARC to protect against domain spoofing.
  • Consider Shared IP: If on a shared IP, be aware of other users' sending behaviour.

What email marketers say
10Marketer opinions

Spam spikes in Google Postmaster Tools on days with no email sends can be attributed to several factors. These include delayed feedback loops from prior sends, potential spoofing or list bombing attacks, changes in user behavior or aggressive filtering by ISPs, poor list hygiene involving stale or trap email addresses, inconsistencies in sender reputation and authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and the possibility of a compromised email system sending unauthorized emails. Shared IP addresses and the actions of other senders can also impact your reputation. Essentially, delayed reporting, external abuse, and ongoing maintenance of sender reputation are key considerations.

Key opinions

  • Delayed Feedback: Spam complaints reported today might stem from emails sent previously.
  • Spoofing/Bombing: Malicious actors could be using your domain or adding your email to many lists.
  • External Factors: ISPs may have updated filtering, and user behavior can change.
  • List Hygiene: Old or invalid addresses can trigger spam complaints.
  • Reputation Issues: Inconsistent authentication or sender history can affect deliverability.
  • Compromised System: Unauthorized emails could be originating from your system.
  • Shared IP: Other senders on your IP can affect your spam rate.

Key considerations

  • Review Feedback Loops: Analyze feedback loops for insights into spam complaints.
  • Implement DMARC: Use DMARC to prevent domain spoofing.
  • Monitor Reputation: Track sender reputation metrics and authentication protocols.
  • Clean Email Lists: Regularly remove inactive or problematic email addresses.
  • Secure Systems: Audit user access and secure email systems against unauthorized access.
  • Check for List Bombing: Implement CAPTCHA and double opt-in on forms.
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email on Acid answers that inconsistencies in sender reputation, authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and content quality can cumulatively impact spam scores, even when no emails are actively being sent. Ongoing reputation damage affects future assessments.

May 2022 - Email on Acid
Marketer view

Email marketer from Hubspot shares that a sender's reputation is based on the history of sending and how recipients interact with emails. If your sender reputation decreases, email providers are more likely to mark the email as spam.

July 2021 - Hubspot
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that if an email's 5322.From is your domain and it's sent to a Gmail address and a user marks it as spam, it goes into Google Postmaster Tools (GPT) and you can add a special header into the emails to identify individual campaigns in Google Postmaster Tools.

July 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Litmus shares that issues with list hygiene (e.g., sending to old, unengaged addresses or spam traps) can cause spam complaints, even if no new campaigns are being sent. These addresses are more likely to report emails as spam.

December 2022 - Litmus
Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks suggests verifying dashboard accuracy with the ESP and implementing DMARC in report-only mode to identify potential spoofing issues that might be causing the spam spikes in Google Postmaster.

June 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view

Email marketer from Mailjet shares that sudden increases in spam complaints, even with consistent sending practices, could stem from changes in user behavior, aggressive spam filtering updates by ISPs, or issues with list hygiene, such as stale email addresses being marked as spam traps.

March 2025 - Mailjet
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit mentions that if you're on a shared IP address, another sender's poor practices could negatively affect your reputation and lead to spam spikes, regardless of your sending volume.

December 2021 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from Reddit user suggests that your domain could be subject to a 'list bombing' attack where someone is submitting your email to multiple sign up forms. Ensure forms have CAPTCHA and use double opt-in.

March 2022 - Reddit
Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Marketing Forum suggests that a compromised email account or system could be sending unauthorized emails, leading to spam complaints even when you're not actively sending campaigns. Check security settings and audit user access.

October 2021 - Email Marketing Forum
Marketer view

Email marketer from Validity shares that the feedback loops could be delayed and reported later than expected. This means the spikes you're seeing on days when you don't send any emails could actually be related to the emails you sent on previous days.

February 2024 - Validity

What the experts say
4Expert opinions

Spam spikes in Google Postmaster Tools, even on days without email sends, can be influenced by delayed reporting of complaints and the impact of even a single complaint on low-volume days. Machine learning systems are designed to handle these fluctuations. Additionally, the issue may stem from unauthorized third parties sending emails that appear to originate from your domain, underscoring the importance of reviewing feedback loops to identify the source of spam complaints.

Key opinions

  • Delayed Reporting: Spam complaints often reflect past sends, not current activity.
  • Single Complaint Impact: A single spam report can disproportionately affect rates on low-volume days.
  • Third-Party Abuse: Unauthorized senders using your domain can damage your reputation.
  • Machine Learning Handling: Machine learning systems are designed to cope with spikes.

Key considerations

  • Review Feedback Loops: Analyze feedback loops to identify the origin of spam complaints.
  • Investigate Unauthorized Sending: Check for and prevent unauthorized use of your domain.
  • Don't Panic: Recognize that ML algorithms are trained to manage the normal level of complaint spikes.
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks explains that most complaints are reported the day they’re reported, not the day the mail was sent. A single complaint on a low-volume day can skew complaint rates.

September 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that the problem might not be you. Are there third parties sending mail that looks like it's coming from your domain? If they're not authenticating properly, that could be hurting you.

September 2024 - Spam Resource
Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains that the most useful thing a sender can do is review their feedback loops. They contain critical information about who is marking mail as spam.

April 2021 - Word to the Wise
Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks explains that machine learning engines can cope with spikes in spam complaints, suggesting the user shouldn't be too concerned about them.

July 2023 - Email Geeks

What the documentation says
5Technical articles

Spam spikes in Google Postmaster Tools during periods of no email sends are attributed to several technical factors. These include delayed reporting of spam complaints, affecting metrics out of sync with send times; adjustments in Spam Confidence Levels (SCL) by email providers; and persistent issues with sender reputation, caused by high bounce or complaint rates. DNS configuration problems such as SPF or DKIM failures can also trigger spam filters, even when no emails are being actively sent. Analyzing feedback loops, sender reputation metrics, and content are critical for understanding these spikes.

Key findings

  • Delayed Complaints: Spam reports are not always immediate; prior sends can impact current metrics.
  • SCL Adjustments: Email providers may retroactively reclassify emails as spam, affecting past results.
  • Reputation Impact: Poor sender reputation leads to spam filtering, regardless of send volume.
  • DNS Issues: SPF and DKIM failures can trigger spam filters, leading to spikes.

Key considerations

  • Analyze Feedback Loops: Scrutinize feedback loops to understand spam complaint sources.
  • Monitor Reputation Metrics: Track sender reputation, bounce rates, and complaint rates.
  • Review DNS Configuration: Ensure SPF and DKIM records are correctly configured.
  • Content Analysis: Review Email Content to improve quality of messages.
Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft explains that delayed Spam Confidence Level (SCL) adjustments could contribute to spam spikes. Messages initially categorized as non-spam might later be re-evaluated, affecting your Postmaster Tools metrics on subsequent days.

June 2023 - Microsoft
Technical article

Documentation from AWS Simple Email Service (SES) explains that consistently poor sender reputation metrics, such as high bounce or complaint rates, can trigger spam filtering even on days with minimal or no email activity. ISPs use these metrics to determine deliverability.

April 2024 - AWS
Technical article

Documentation from SparkPost explains that investigating spam complaint spikes requires analyzing feedback loops, sender reputation metrics, and content analysis, and also suggests that delayed complaints from previous sends can affect current day's metrics even with no new sends.

February 2025 - SparkPost
Technical article

Documentation from Google explains that spam rate spikes in Google Postmaster Tools can occur due to users marking legitimate emails as spam, which impacts sender reputation and deliverability. This can happen even on days with low or no sending volume.

June 2023 - Google
Technical article

Documentation from RFC specifies that DNS configuration problems (e.g., SPF, DKIM failures) can cause authentication issues, leading to increased spam filtering and potential spikes in spam complaints reported in Postmaster Tools, regardless of sending volume.

May 2022 - RFC Editor